The principle of mandatory criminal prosecution and the independence of public prosecutors in the Italian criminal justice system
نویسنده
چکیده
The purpose of this article is to explain the reasons for adopting, in Italy, the principle of mandatory criminal prosecution. This rule is closely connected to the role and functions of Italian public prosecutors. The supreme guarantee deriving from the rule governing the mandatory status of criminal prosecution is to safeguard the equal treatment of all citizens before criminal law. This is possible only if criminal prosecution is the responsibility of a public body carrying out public functions without any external interference. This is the reason for the independence of public prosecutors from the other powers of the state. But, there has been a tendency to separate the status of public procurators, currently equal to that of judges. That could open the way for the dependence of public prosecutors on executive power, with the risk of substituting the provision of mandatory criminal prosecution with the opposite opportunity principle, thus helping to explain the large gap between the principle of mandatory criminal prosecution and the reality. Therefore, if the provision of mandatory criminal prosecution is to be fully respected it is absolutely necessary that public prosecutors remain independent from external influences. If this were not the case, criminal prosecution would become discriminatory and the principle of equality would be damaged.
منابع مشابه
The Role of the Prosecution in Judging the Criminal System from a Moral and Legal Perspective
Background: Judgment of a criminal policy Resolving criminal cases in various ways and manifestations, outside the scope of official repressive measures, is a strategy of contracting criminal law derived from civil law, and its main root is in ethics and morality. In society, and given that the prosecution of a criminal case is not the main purpose of criminal law; Rather, prosecution is seen a...
متن کاملThe Role of Doctors in the Pre-Trial
The activities of the criminal justice system began with the commission of the crime and tries to social order is restored and the victim is entitled to the right with the transition from the stages of exposure of a crime, prosecution, investigation, trial and execution of the sentence. Throughout the steps above, the steps taken in the exposure of a crime, prosecution, primarily investigation ...
متن کاملحقوق بیماران در نظام عدالت کیفری
What is the nature of patients’ rights in the criminal justice system? Is it according to Hoffiildi’s analysis of right, a duty (responsibility) or a right-privilege? In this article, besides elaborating on the nature of patient’s rights in the criminal justice system and explaining its effects, we will try to analyze the dimensions of this right in various stages of imple...
متن کاملEthics Governing Criminal Policy in the Islamic Legal System
Background: Islam as a comprehensive religion rooted in human nature and revealed in order to respond to basic human needs has broadened the ethics of its criminal policy to include crime, crime and punishment. In keeping with each other and with the other rules of this religion, it has set guidelines and values based on ethics and principles for avoiding crime in the community if the Prophet...
متن کاملThe place of the Principle of Proceedings within a reasonable time in the criminal proceedings
Observing a reasonable deadline throughout the criminal investigation process, as one of the most fundamental defensive rights of the accused, emphasizes the importance of reasonable expediting in the process of proceedings in a high degree of accuracy, which considers necessary for the fair trial and the desired outcome of criminal proceedings. Delivering justice within a reasonable time is on...
متن کامل